limiteinductive
e940afde52
Monorepo structure:
- crates/colony-types: API types (serde + ts-rs), separate from DB models
- crates/colony: Axum server, SQLite via sqlx, migrations
Working endpoints:
- GET /api/health
- GET/POST /api/channels
- GET /api/channels/{id}
- GET /api/channels/{id}/messages (?since=, ?type=, ?user_id=)
- POST /api/channels/{id}/messages (with type + metadata)
Data model includes:
- seq monotonic ordering, soft delete, same-channel reply constraint
- Seeded users (benji, neeraj) and #general channel
Also: codex-review skill, .gitignore
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
37 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
37 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: codex-review
|
|
description: Get a parallel GPT-5.4 review of code, plans, or decisions. Use when you want a second opinion, finished a non-trivial implementation, or want to validate an approach before presenting to the ape.
|
|
argument-hint: "[what to review — file paths, plan description, or question]"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Codex Review
|
|
|
|
Get an independent GPT-5.4 review via codex CLI. Use this proactively after finishing non-trivial work, or when you want a second opinion before proceeding.
|
|
|
|
## When to use
|
|
|
|
- After writing a significant chunk of code
|
|
- Before presenting an architecture decision to the ape
|
|
- When you're unsure about an approach
|
|
- After a refactor to catch regressions
|
|
- When the critic skill feels too heavy (critic is for decisions, this is for code review)
|
|
|
|
## Execution
|
|
|
|
Run this command via Bash, substituting the review request:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
codex exec -c 'reasoning_effort="high"' "Review: $ARGUMENTS. Read all relevant files. Be specific — file paths, line numbers, exact issues. What bugs, edge cases, or design problems exist? Do NOT spawn sub-agents. Answer directly in bullet points." 2>&1
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Can run in background** (`run_in_background: true`) if you have other work to do in parallel.
|
|
|
|
## Output
|
|
|
|
Present the codex findings to the ape as:
|
|
- Issues found (if any)
|
|
- Agreements with your approach (if reviewing your own work)
|
|
- Disagreements to address
|
|
|
|
If codex found real issues in your code, fix them before presenting to the ape. Apes don't do tasks.
|